This may be the sole category won by acclamation!
10) Biggest Pro-Censorship Ass-Hat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Welcome Infidels!
Why We Fight
Do not mistake this for hyperbole.
...
In Canada, saying the wrong thing even in jest can drag you through Star Chamber tribunals and commissions without the benefit of due process, can bankrupt you, destroy your career and your family, result in lifetime bans on free speech and expression (of the Gospel, no less) and ultimately even lead to imprisonment. Freedom of speech and expression, freedom to practice religion as we choose, are guaranteed by our constitution.
For all the good it does us.
Remember "Live as if the revolution has already happened"
...
In Canada, saying the wrong thing even in jest can drag you through Star Chamber tribunals and commissions without the benefit of due process, can bankrupt you, destroy your career and your family, result in lifetime bans on free speech and expression (of the Gospel, no less) and ultimately even lead to imprisonment. Freedom of speech and expression, freedom to practice religion as we choose, are guaranteed by our constitution.
For all the good it does us.
Remember "Live as if the revolution has already happened"
Infidel Blog Awards Nomination Categories
-
▼
2008
(14)
-
▼
November
(14)
-
▼
Nov 04
(10)
- Category No. 1) Blogger most likely to face a Sect...
- Category No. 2) Most insulting to the CHRC Blog Post
- Category No. 3) Most Insulting to the Prophet Blog...
- Category No.4) Best Anti-Islamist Blog Post
- Category No. 5) Best Infidel Blogger - non-restric...
- Category No. 6) Favourite Gal Infidel Blogger
- Category No. 7) Favourite Guy Infidel Blogger
- Category No. 8) Most favourite MSM Anti-Islamist P...
- Category No. 9) Least Favourite Useful Idiot MSM P...
- Category No. 10) Biggest Pro-Censorship Ass-Hat
-
▼
Nov 04
(10)
-
▼
November
(14)
52 comments:
Charles Johnson at Little Green Fottballs.
http://lyingjackal.com
Ontario Human Rights Commissioner Barbara Hall for issuing a guilty verdict against Mark Stein in the same statement in which she declined to hear the complaint against him because it was not within her jurisdiction.
Richard Warman for making a career out of filing CHRC complaints for no reason other than he can.
Warren Kinsella, or "Wearin' Thin Skin-sella" I like to call him... by a mile.
Richard Warman is an asshat, but should be named biggest HRC profiteer. I propose a separate category.
Bob
Ezra Levant for writing such nauseating hyperbole he single-handedly turned off any reasonable people who might have considered opposing Section 13.
J-school prof John Miller OR Bernie Farber
The nomination of Ezra Levant is a stroke of genious. I strongly second the sentiment.
Dick Warmer (sp.?)
Bigcitylib,
at Bigcitylib strikes back.
At least I'd hope to make the top five.
BigCityLib.
Jason Cherniak for suggesting SDA be banned from the Blogging Tories.
http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2008/03/blogging-tories-should-suspend-small.html
Cherniak on Politics
Or Stephen Harper. The Tory convention draft resolutions are out and you guys got nothing out of them.
http://nationalnewswatchplus.com/pdf/con.pdf
Dr.Dawg.
Dr. Dawg. We encountered this fool once. Such vanity in a such a small mind must crowd out all other thought and feeling.
Well said. I'm obviously a shoo-in.
"Shoo-in"? I must ask if that's a euphemism for "not house-trained.
On the serious side, and I think I realise this is a light-hearted poll we're having here, which is why Dr. Dawg and co. come to say hello, I prefer the serious company of genuinely evil people such as Greg Felton and Elan Pappe, as examples, simply because they are professionals dedicated to their work. Dr Dawg and the liberal guy, they are obviously not evil people, not serious, not a threat to anyone, not even annoying. Warman hardly fits the evil bill, nor the other guy, Kinsella. I think you all are in some ways fortunate to have as rivals such ordinary and likely personally decent folks as Dr. Dawg and Kinsella: you don't know, or don't seem to know, just how seriously evil some people can be and are. How this escapes anyone is beyond my small mental abilities to grasp. We have serious and deadly enemies, and they kill people. More than ass-hats, they murder people. I prefer dealing with them because they are serious and they are committed. The chit chat is fun, and please don't exclude me over a flash of indiscretion on occasion.
For those who are serious to the extent one finds in a Felton, feel free to join me and my friends in person at VPL or on-line at covenant zone or no dhimmitude. I'm also always happy to take mail at my home email address.
Best regards, Dag.
Well said Dag.
Do I qualify?
Only if you are able to provide sufficient evidence of 1st rank ass-hattery Sask Boy, it will be up to the voters at any rate.
Charles "Silence, Peon!" Johnson at LGF.
Definitely that Liberal lunatic Warren Kinsella.
Guy's pathologically intolerant and phobic of inconvenient truth and fair comment thereupon.
To make it worse, he thinks he can say whatever he wants about whomever, but no one can say anything not-nice about him without his permission...
What a pure, unadulterated, hardcore asshat, and, boy, does that hat reek... after all, look at what it's on!
Asshat #1 - Richard Warman
Profitsbeard?! Well, I'll be a son-of-a-gun-of-Walker. Good to see you here.
Blazing Cat Fur, thank you as always for the kind words.
And since I'm here, let me vote again for Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs. I think this should count because I don't see any typos this time.
Little Green Footballs, should be a no-brainer.
Levant is my choice...no one not a soul has done more to turn people off than has he...I still remember seeing him on TVO last year trying to debate Farber, he was like a highschool kid with sweaty palms, farber eviscerated him!!
While you're dreamin Chapel why not ask for a pony?
http://whatdoiknowgrit.blogspot.com/2008/10/another-ctv-boycott-letter.html
James Morton
Chuck Johnson at LGF. Try disagreeing with something he says if you don't believe it.
:)
Blazingcarfur, Chapel has written what I believe many mainstream people feel. I know Ezra is very popular amongst those on the edgy blogosphere right but in the real world either people have hardly heard of him or they are turned off by his childish way behaviour.
I'm a salesman. I travel a lot and honestly I think sometimes we live in our own cocoon type world.
Almost everyone who are aware of this debate to whom I have spoken tell me that Ezra has done much harm to the cause. He is seen quite simply as so over-the-top as to be totally without merit.
As a person who wants to see changes to Human Rights commissions I fully agree with those who have nominated Ezra for this prize. We would do much better in the mainstream and with the Tories if he were just to act more like a reasonable adult instead of a child.
Sorry anon not buyin, I have the benefit of access.
This mindless, genuinely unthinking sentimentalization of social relations is what's got Canada into this muck in the first place. This assumption, based on passive acceptance of general behaviour,is why the HRCs exist. Nice? How nice is this crap? Nice is for sentimentlists who refuse to think about the realities of existence, who flock to the nearest pastel colored shelter to gather and gossip and complain among each other like school girls. Nice? Nice is shit. Nice is Richard Warman. Nice is Velvet Fascism. Nice is Povertarianism. Nice is dirt.
Kinsella and Warman can share this award. Note Kinsella has turned off his comment section LOL
Dawg gets an dishonorable mention.
Charlie at LGF
He banned everyone at Discarded Lies, Gulf Coast Pundit, Littlegreenfootballs2, Atlasshrugs, Babbazeesbrain, Gagdad Bob, etc ... along with anyone that agrees with them, links to them, or even thinks about linking to them it seems.
He has banned people for asking him questions, for dinging him down in his ratings system, for dinging other people up in his rating system, and for any other perceived slight he or his "minions" feel threatened by.
The man is a nut.
This has to be a no-brainer. PERFECT category for Chuck.
I hope it's clear that by nominating Charles Johnson here that anyone involved will be banned from LGF. That probably includes my kitten as well. The lady at the grocery store is concerned that if Charles realizes I shop at her tore,she too will be banned from LGF. I told her not to be concerned since she's never heard of him, but she is concerned, given that if Charles takes over the world he's likely to come and get her. She thinks a man like that could come in and start throwing the milk containers all over the store, ripping u loaves of bread, dumping cans in the aisles. So really, consider the implications of our nominations here. Charles might seem like a long-distance lunatic but one can never tell what the future holds.
I nominate ex-aequo:
All so-called politically correct scholars activists,(professors students and their off-campus militant riff-raff friends) who use their influence for "the cause" in Montreal's universities.
I second Kathy Shaidle on the John Miller nom. According to the good professor, "freedom of speech" is a privilege which should be limited to certified journalists citing approved sources. Guess who does the certifying and approving? Yep, John Miller.
The one and only Mohammed Elmasry from the Canadian Islamic Congress
And all those who support him and his organisation.
Richard (Lucy) Warman = #1 AssHat
Stephen Harper (pending...)
In the same spirit, Ed Stelmach and Gordon Campbell
It's GOT to be Chuckie Johnson at Little Green Footballs by a country mile.
Having beaten him hands down in an abortion debate where he took to pro and I took the anti stance he took the cowards way out and just terminated my access to his site. No ifs or buts just whamo. Our debate involved no histrionics, bad language or threats, just reasoned debate where he seemed 'off his game' and was pretty lame really.
I think Chuck realized that he was losing in front of his minions so he did the stupid thing and indulged himself with an 'ad hominem' attack. When I pointed out to him that by so indulging himself he had effectively 'scuppered' his argument he reacted as do autocrats, 'took his marbles' and effectively ran away by banishing his opponent.
Not very grown up of you Charlie was it?
OK, you run a fairly good blog but you have quite obvious personality deficiencies that ruin what could be an even better blog.
Charles Johnson at LGF for unfair treatment of formerly a=much admired Robert Spencer
I was banned from LGF 4 days ago without an explanation.
My comment was not racist, did not use any foul language.
I'm certainly not a Eurofascist, I am a Canadian and certainly not a facist.
My email remains unanswered.
Charles Johnson deserves the title "biggest pro-censorship ass-hat"
Definitely.
Chucky Johnson from LGF
He bans people for disagreeing with him on a daily basis, but he gives ridiculous reasons that could be justified any way you look at them (eg. asshole).
Mine was hilarious, banned on an 'open thread' for apparently taking the thread off topic.
Hope he enjoys his gaggle of sheeple. That shout out is for you Shamutra and MandyManners.
"Hope he enjoys his gaggle of sheeple. That shout out is for you Shamutra and MandyManners."
Cranky Flakes (TM)
I missed the video, but I did read the book, and frankly, I found the plot trite and the characterization to be minimal at best. Definitely not one of Tolstoy's better works.
I read the manga.
Well, you know, since it is coming up to New Year's Eve and I don't have a date yet, maybe should think of comparing the video to the novel. Intellectual type stuff for the new year and all. Maybe it'll improve my chances at the disco chatting up babes between turns of boogee-ing on the dance floor.
I like the night life. I like to get down.
Uh, other stuff. I can't recall at this age. Oh, never mind, I'm lots of fun. Maybe I'll do what I always do when the nurse brings me pudding. I peak down her blouse!
Happy New Year to you all.
Saw the film. Written, directed and acted by hardcore, depraved leftists with nothing but sex on their minds. Shocking amount of nudity, sexuality and profanity, plus a little bit of fake, comedic violence, reminiscent of pro wrestling. Lots of phoniness, especially with respect to the mammaries. Plus the idiots forgot to take their feckin' shoes off!
At least it was more believable than "An Inconvenient Truth". And had a lot more substance and sincerity than Obama.
Give that man an Oscar!
Post a Comment